[test]: Add unit test for getAutoNumberingFields returning empty array for non-CO table

[rijulpoudel]

Fixes #8320

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Added coverage confirming that auto-numbering returns no fields when none are available.

[github-actions]

Warning

One or more dependencies are approaching or past End-of-Life.
Please plan upgrades accordingly.

STATUS=WARNING
NODE_VERSION=20
NODE_CYCLE=20
EOL_DATE=2026-04-30
DAYS_REMAINING=-78

--- Node.js ---
Version: 20
EOL: 2026-04-30
Status: WARNING

STATUS=OK
PYTHON_VERSION=3.12
PYTHON_CYCLE=3.12
EOL_DATE=2028-10-31
DAYS_REMAINING=837

--- Python ---
Version: 3.12
EOL: 2028-10-31
Status: OK

STATUS=WARNING
DJANGO_VERSION=4.2
DJANGO_CYCLE=4.2
EOL_DATE=2026-04-07
DAYS_REMAINING=-101

--- Django ---
Version: 4.2
EOL: 2026-04-07
Status: WARNING

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 017f8ebd-5a0d-460d-949d-9db13e2e2106

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a798f4c and cc32886.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• specifyweb/frontend/js_src/lib/components/FormMeta/__tests__/AutoNumbering.test.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds Jest coverage confirming getAutoNumberingFields returns an empty array for tables.Locality, which has no auto-numberable fields.

Changes

Auto-numbering tests

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Locality empty-field assertion specifyweb/frontend/js_src/lib/components/FormMeta/__tests__/AutoNumbering.test.ts	Adds a test verifying that getAutoNumberingFields(tables.Locality) returns no field names.

Possibly related PRs

• specify/specify7#8319: Adds related FormMeta test coverage for auto-numbering and bulk-clone validation involving Locality.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6

✅ Passed checks (6 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the added unit test for getAutoNumberingFields on a non-Collection Object table.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The change matches issue #8320 by adding a test for non-Collection Object auto-numbering behavior.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The PR only adds a focused test case and includes no unrelated code changes.
Automatic Tests	✅ Passed	The PR adds a Jest test covering the new empty-array case for getAutoNumberingFields on tables.Locality.
Testing Instructions	✅ Passed	The new Jest tests clearly target getAutoNumberingFields and cover both CollectionObject and a non-autonumberable table (Locality), matching the affected component.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch issue-8320

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}