Added deprecations page for Cohesivo 6.0#3279
Open
mnocon wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Preview of modified filesPreview of modified Markdown: |
Summary
Errors per inputErrors in site/release_notes/cohesivo_v6.0_deprecations/index.html
Errors in site/resources/rector/index.html
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Target: 5.0, 6.0
Adding deprecations page for the upcoming Cohesivo 6.0, to let Partners know about the upcoming changes ahead of time.
For now, the following changes are covered:
As a new Rector rule is added, there's a need for dedicated Rector page:
I've extracted the exsiting content (from update_to_5.0.md and package's README) into a separate page we can refer people to.
As this might be the first time people hear about Cohesivo, I've added 2 links explaining the business reasoning.
Status: this needs to be merged with the upcoming release, as this is when the Rector rule becomes available.
Link checker results should be ignored, there's a known issue here (fixed in #3280 )