Skip to content

Rust::com Cleanup deprecated Rust APIs#602

Merged
LittleHuba merged 4 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
bharatGoswami8:Rust_old_APIs_cleanup
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

Rust::com Cleanup deprecated Rust APIs#602
LittleHuba merged 4 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
bharatGoswami8:Rust_old_APIs_cleanup

Conversation

@bharatGoswami8

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Removed old APIs example.
  • Removed legacy integration tests and related test documentation.
  • The LoLa runtime builder, consumer, and producer switch to the bridge-local instance and handle types and call the bridge initialization path.
  • Cleaned up obsolete configuration, generated artifacts, and compatibility layers no longer used by the product.

#432

@@ -56,10 +56,9 @@
// - This enables type-safe communication without C++ needing to know Rust types at compile time
//
// Dependencies:
// - It relies on proxy_bridge_rs crate for FatPtr and ProxyWrapperClass definitions
// - C FFI implementations (mw_com_impl_*) are all in registry_bridge_macro.cpp

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion:
Better to add bridge_ffi.rs in separate folder as its generic FFI interface abstraction and currently implemented by lola but eventually it can be implemented by any other communication mechanism

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we can plan to move with common file but may be with separate PR or when Method/Field FFI implementation we are doing that time it may help to create separate interface file.
As this PR for cleanup old APIs so i think we can keep it in same folder as of now.

@bharatGoswami8 bharatGoswami8 force-pushed the Rust_old_APIs_cleanup branch 2 times, most recently from da146a1 to 2a1164e Compare July 1, 2026 03:29
@bharatGoswami8 bharatGoswami8 marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2026 03:29
@bharatGoswami8 bharatGoswami8 force-pushed the Rust_old_APIs_cleanup branch 2 times, most recently from 38742d1 to e5d8eb9 Compare July 1, 2026 10:23
@bharatGoswami8

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR required review from @darkwisebear, so please do not merge it.

…d APIs

* Removed the Rust Old APIs implementation and target
* Updated the re-used code into FFI folder
* Move the init in FFI trait
* Created common_rs for ffi
@bharatGoswami8 bharatGoswami8 force-pushed the Rust_old_APIs_cleanup branch from e5d8eb9 to 951a6f5 Compare July 6, 2026 07:19
@LittleHuba LittleHuba added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 6, 2026
Merged via the queue into eclipse-score:main with commit 79a9b36 Jul 6, 2026
8 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Backlog to Done in COM - Communication FT Jul 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants