fix: sync vendor registry contract client#106
Draft
Davidemulo wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #96
Synchronizes the vendor-registry client with the deployed Soroban contract so vendor checks use the current function names, Stellar Address arguments, and typed status model. It also narrows missing-vendor handling to contract error code 4 so integration drift is logged and fails loudly.
This repo is for the NestJS backend API only
Type of change
Changes Made
Testing
Commands run:
Context files reviewed
The current StepFi-Contracts vendor-registry lib.rs, types.rs, and errors.rs were also reviewed to confirm the deployed signatures, status variants, and VendorNotFound error code.