-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: Adopt TraceExporter's Telemetry stuff #183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Aaalibaba42
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
jwiriath/telemetry
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+123
−41
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa886f6
feat: Adopt TraceExporter's Telemetry stuff
Aaalibaba42 f77f8a3
docs: fix libdatadog's behavior when 0 is passed
Aaalibaba42 0db60a5
chore: js tomfoolery
Aaalibaba42 40d34eb
fix: comments
Aaalibaba42 ab0de16
fix: use Cells uniformaly
Aaalibaba42 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it ok to take it instead of clone? Do we only use the config exactly once? It looks like the next time
send_prepared_chunkwill be called,telemetry_configwill be gone.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exporter_slotgoes from None to Some, so the entire build block is skipped on every subsequentsend_prepared_chunk(l529), if the build fails,build_erroris latched and the next call returns early before reaching thetake(l534), so yes it should be okay by line 563.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. I think I was confused by the fact that other values are cloned (headers, otlp endpoint) above instead of being taken out. Is that because we'll need them later?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a quick glance,
build_errorcould be a Cell, but the others genuinely borrows from the content. If you think having all RefCell would help readability I don't mind too much, the impact of the borrow counting is probably minimal, otherwise I can makebuild_erroralso aCellUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But then we clone them, right?
self.otlp_protocol.get()clones, andotlp_headersis also cloned L560. So I'm just wondering which possibility is it:We use all those values
otlp_protocol,otlp_headers,telemetry_configexactly only once for the builder. In this case it's strange that they have a different treatment thantelemetry_config. We should rather useself.otlp_protocol.take()andstd::mem::take(self.otlp_headers.borrow_mut()). Maybe it doesn't really matter forOtlpProtcolwhich is stack-allocated anyway, but the headers are a vec, so it does avoid a clone. And in that situation in fact theotlp_headersshould probably not even be aRefCell, but aCell? Unless it's built in several steps?Some of these values are re-used elsewhere afterwards, so we need to let them live in
self. Then the current version makes sense, and this was basically my question aboveIt's just not obvious that e.g.
headersandtelemetry_configshould be treated differentlyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah you are right it's situation 1, otlp_protocol is Copy and otlp_headers is cloned, they should also be Cells for I don't think they are reused elsewhere