Replies: 3 comments
|
I suggest that a general mechanism be devised, by which a user verb is also able to detect such a situation and perhaps skip side effects. |
0 replies
|
Something like returnifempty. keyword? Or maybe dolittle. would be more poetic... That said, adding to the language's vocabulary is out of scope here. This particular issue is about addressing an issue with the threading vocabulary. A proposal for new vocabulary should belong in a different issue, where it could be discussed and treated adequately. |
0 replies
|
The issue is execution on fill-cells, nothing specific to T. . You can use ^:(*@#@]) to suppress execution on empty, or use u&.> which does not bother with execution on a fill-cell |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
See thread leading to http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/beta/2022-April/010458.html for details
All reactions