We never enter ISEQs whose type is ISEQ_TYPE_MAIN/ISEQ_TYPE_EVAL, so it shouldn't need JIT entries.
Removing them would free us from worrying about what to do for such ISEQs (or checking crate::cruby::iseq_escapes_ep) when dealing with argument locals in JIT entries.
We should also consider renaming either crate::invariants::iseq_escapes_ep or crate::cruby::iseq_escapes_ep to avoid confusion.
We never enter ISEQs whose type is ISEQ_TYPE_MAIN/ISEQ_TYPE_EVAL, so it shouldn't need JIT entries.
Removing them would free us from worrying about what to do for such ISEQs (or checking
crate::cruby::iseq_escapes_ep) when dealing with argument locals in JIT entries.We should also consider renaming either
crate::invariants::iseq_escapes_eporcrate::cruby::iseq_escapes_epto avoid confusion.