Skip to content

Audit scientific Code and AI-written tests #55

Description

@rohanplatts

Purpose

Review scientifically important code and audit tests written by AI, particularly where Claude produced both the implementation and expected test values.

Completion criteria

  • Scientific code covered by the JOSS scope has been human-reviewed and human annotated.
  • Updates made to architecture.md,
  • Updates made to AI_usage.md, and general ProbeFlow documentation.
  • Critical expected values have been independently checked.
  • Formal review of all AI created tests, with independently verified comparison results.
  • Validation results and limitations are documented.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentationrefactor

Type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions