Improve gbak logging of ignored records with skip/include (schema) data by mentioning the table name

[mrotteveel]

Currently, looking at Firebird 5.0.4, and snapshot of 6.0.0, when using gbak with -skip_data, -include_data, -skip_schema_data or -include_schema_data on restore (i.e. the backup does include data for the tables), the gbak output mentions that records are ignored, but not the table.

For example, when using -SKIP_DATA TAB_1_%, the log output is:

gbak:restoring table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_A"
gbak:    restoring column "ID"
gbak:restoring table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_B"
gbak:    restoring column "ID"
gbak:restoring table "PUBLIC"."TAB_2_A"
gbak:    restoring column "ID"
gbak:restoring table "PUBLIC"."TAB_2_B"
gbak:    restoring column "ID"
gbak:committing metadata
gbak:restoring data for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_2_B"
gbak:   1 records restored
gbak:restoring data for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_2_A"
gbak:   1 records restored
gbak:     1 records ignored
gbak:     1 records ignored

The following lines are in my opinion not very helpful:

gbak:     1 records ignored
gbak:     1 records ignored

They don't mention the tables (i.e. "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_A" and "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_B"), making the log lines confusing at best.

I suggest that we change the logging to explicitly mention the table, for example like:

gbak: skipping data for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_A"
gbak:   1 records ignored
gbak: skipping data for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_B"
gbak:   1 records ignored

or, more compact:

gbak: skipped 1 records for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_A"
gbak: skipped 1 records for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_B"

Or something like 1 records ignored for table "PUBLIC"."TAB_1_A", but I think using the verb skip makes more explicit this is related to the skip/include feature.

(Also, separately, the indentation seems off for those 1 records ignored lines.)